[ ... ] letter which is marked at the top with the number NG-204; is that correct? A. Two hundred and four. [ ... ]
[ ... ] , we had some discussion of the Document NG-204 which was identified by General Lehmann and marked for identification as Exhibit 381, its admittance in formally sending the document up, I would like to comment just briefly on the present form of the Document NG-204. The witness Lehmann referred only to the [ ... ]
[ ... ] session, but because the 24 hours had not elapsed by a short period of time, it was not introduced. It's Document NO. NG-204, Exhibit 331 that had identification. Does that apply to NG-204? MR. LA FOLLETTE: That is right, your Honor. JUDGE BRAND:[ ... ]
[ ... ] class="speaker">JUDGE BRAND: I have a note here, which appears to be wrong, that Exhibit 427 was NG-204, to go into Book IX-B. Will you correct [ ... ]
[ ... ] MR. LAFOLLETTE: If Your Honor please, I recall that now. That had been given as exhibit number 381, NG-204. There [ ... ]
[ ... ] . Mettgenberg. The Prosecution has introduced Exhibit 381 - that is, NG 204. This exhibit consists of six sheets, the sixth sheet, that is, the last one [ ... ]
[ ... ] 381, NG 204) sent defendant von Ammon an information copy of his letter to the German Foreign Office, dated 4 April 1944, in which Huelle comments on [ ... ]