[ ... ] the German Book, Document NG 352. NG 352 is another case record of the People's Court. When it was unearthed no indictment could be found which [ ... ]
[ ... ] indictment to me." That will be all of the excerpts that we desire to read at the moment. We will turn now to Document NG-352, Page 74, Reich is Page 87 of [ ... ]
[ ... ] been pronounced." The prosecution offers as Exhibit No. 129, Document NG-352. [ ... ]
[ ... ] the following: The sentence in Document NG-352 dates the 12th of August, 1942; the previous document, which has just been read out in full, Exhibit 128 [ ... ]
[ ... ] Prosecution, in connection with presenting NG-352, that is the sentence of 3 August, 1942, the Prosecution said that the indictment was not available, but it to make to clear up the discrepancy of dates; we will hear from you on that alone. DR. GRUBE: In Document NG-352, which [ ... ]
[ ... ] NG 352 is based upon a document which was signed by the defendant Lautz. Therefore, I consider it materially unfounded if the Prosecution in this offered in evidence. MR. WOOLEYHAN: The Prosecution offers NG-352 as Exhibit 129. Turning now to page 84, which is page 97 [ ... ]
[ ... ] . 128, NG-355. dated 24 Feb. 1942; Tr. pp. 844 Ex. 129, NG-352, dated 12 Aug. 1942; Tr. pp. 852 Ex. 130, NG-641, dated May 1943; Tr. pp. 864 Ex [ ... ]
[ ... ] 129, Document NG-352; the Prosecution claims that Dr. Barnickel's guilt is revealed from the Lautz Exhibit 199. I have to point out that contrary to [ ... ]