[ ... ] so far. It is not contained in our document book. There is a chart in our document book but that is numbered NO-111, and, therefore, I suggest that [ ... ]
[ ... ] ; Pohl, in addition to being Chief of the WVHA, is also Chief of Division W. I would like to introduce Prosecution Exhibit No. 38, being Document NO-111 [ ... ]
[ ... ] WVHA, I believe it is NO-111 -- it is in Document Book No. II and under you as Chief of Amtsgruppe A and under Fanslau, as Chief of Office A-5, it of Document NO-111. I will supply the court with a complete translation of this document. This is the only omission which exists in the translation [ ... ]
[ ... ] defendant Fanslau): Q Witness, this chart, which is Document NO-111 , did you know it from before? A May I see it for just one moment, please? Yes, I know [ ... ]
[ ... ] this chart correctly represented the organization of the WVHA, referring to NO 111, and you also heard Pohl give the same testimony. Do you wish to [ ... ]
[ ... ] MR. ROBBINS: It's almost identical, but not quite. It is identical with Document NO-111, which is in Document Book No [ ... ]
[ ... ] the chart number is NO-111. The field of task A-V/4 is mentioned there. A. Well, yes, these mistakes are quite possible [ ... ]
[ ... ] Court No. II, Case No. 4. A That is NO-111. Q That is in order, the old organizational chart of the WVHA? A Yes, that was already contained in [ ... ]
[ ... ] your contention? A Yes. Q Then document NO-111, with which I would think you are familiar [ ... ]